Browsing Tag

sex after baby

How to Get Your Groove Back

FAM, self By September 30, 2011 Tags: , , , No Comments

I know. It’s late, you’re tired, you’re wearing scruffy old clothes..heck, you may even smell funny, because you’ve been postponing your shower since “something” always comes up at the last minute. Bed is looking mighty fine. The quiet time after your kids have finally conked out…priceless. As you head for the pillow, you feel something akin to joy at the idea of being vertical for a while. Then you look at your dear husband and you see the “come hither” look in his eyes. First thing that crosses your mind: “Is is insane??” Second thing: “Oh, no.” In roll the excuses, ranging from a fake headache (or a real one) to your stinkiness. But why?

Share:
rekindle your sex life

7 Ways to Revamp Your Sex Life

FAM, self By May 15, 2011 Tags: , , , , 1 Comment

Some say that children can be the best birth control. Combine a long-term marriage and some kids and most couples hit that impact point when they are wondering exactly what happened to their sex life.  Studies show, hands down, that a great sex life improves a relationship – and lack thereof can undermine it. Believe it or not, it really doesn’t take much to get your sex life back on track. Here are a few ideas to get you going in the right direction:

Share:

Panty by Post

GEAR, style, Uncategorized By January 31, 2009 Tags: , , , No Comments

Panty by PostOh la la!  Opening the mail has never been so exciting.  Instead of bills and flyers, what appeared in my mailbox today?  Nothing other than the sexiest, frilly French panties that I have ever seen.  Panty by Post is the brainchild of Natalie Grunberg and Lori Sholzberg, and in our estimation, will up Canada’s birthrate by alot.  Great as a gift delivered monthly, you can order one, six or twelve pairs of sexy panties.  Sure to boost your self esteem during the pregnancy or postpardom period, the marketing for the company features naturally beautiful women who are not airbrushed.  Fabulous! 

Share: